This book argues for a change in our understanding of the relationships among law, politics, and history. Since the turn of the nineteenth century, a certain anti-foundational conception of history has served to undermine la...

Buy Now From Amazon

This book argues for a change in our understanding of the relationships among law, politics, and history. Since the turn of the nineteenth century, a certain anti-foundational conception of history has served to undermine law's foundations, such that we tend to think of law as nothing other than a species of politics. Thus viewed, the activity of unelected, common law judges appears to be an encroachment on the space of democracy. However, Kunal M. Parker shows that the world of the nineteenth century looked rather different. Democracy was itself constrained by a sense that history possessed a logic, meaning, and direction that democracy could not contravene. In such a world, far from law being seen in opposition to democracy, it was possible to argue that law - specifically, the common law - did a better job than democracy of guiding America along history's path.

Similar Products

Reconstructing Reconstruction: The Supreme Court and the Production of Historical TruthTocqueville's Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America, 1900-1940City of Courts: Socializing Justice in Progressive Era Chicago (Cambridge Historical Studies in American Law and Society)The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American GovernmentScenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America (Race and American Culture)The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South