In this essay, Hegel attempted to show how Fichte's Science of Knowledge was an advance from the position of Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason, and how Schelling (and incidentally Hegel himself) had made a fu...

Buy Now From Amazon

In this essay, Hegel attempted to show how Fichte's Science of Knowledge was an advance from the position of Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason, and how Schelling (and incidentally Hegel himself) had made a further advance from the position of Fichte.

Hegel finds the idealism of Fichte too abstractly subjective and formalistic, and he tries to show how Schelling's philosophy of nature is the remedy for these weaknesses. But the most important philosophical content of the essay is probably to be found in his general introduction to these critical efforts where he deals with a number of problems about philosophical method in a way which is of general interest to philosophers, and not merely interesting to those who accept the Hegelian "dialectic method" which grew out of these first beginnings. Finally, the Difference essay is important in the development of "Nature-Philosophy" as a movement in the history of science.

  • Used Book in Good Condition
  • Used Book in Good Condition

Similar Products

Hegel: Faith and KnowledgeThe Science of Knowledge: With the First and Second Introductions (Texts in German Philosophy)System of Transcendental Idealism (1800)Hegel's Science of LogicPhilosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom (Suny Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy)Phenomenology of SpiritGerman Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801Early Theological Writings (Works in Continental Philosophy)