First Amendment defenders greeted the Citizens United ruling with enthusiasm, while electoral reformers recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divide...

Buy Now From Amazon

First Amendment defenders greeted the Citizens United ruling with enthusiasm, while electoral reformers recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps, and explains how the case might've been decided in a way that would preserve free speech and electoral integrity.

Similar Products

The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning CampaignsThe Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform (Chicago Studies in American Politics)The Perfect Tie: The True Story of the 2000 Presidential ElectionCorruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens UnitedCampaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists PrevailRepublic, Lost: Version 2.0Presidential SelectionWhy the Electoral College Is Bad for America: Second Edition