What distinguishes good explanations in neuroscience from bad? Carl F. Craver constructs and defends standards for evaluating neuroscientific explanations that are grounded in a systematic view of what neuroscientific explan...

Buy Now From Amazon

What distinguishes good explanations in neuroscience from bad? Carl F. Craver constructs and defends standards for evaluating neuroscientific explanations that are grounded in a systematic view of what neuroscientific explanations are: descriptions of multilevel mechanisms. In developing this approach, he draws on a wide range of examples in the history of neuroscience (e.g. Hodgkin and Huxleys model of the action potential and LTP as a putative explanation for different kinds of memory), as well as recent philosophical work on the nature of scientific explanation. Readers in neuroscience, psychology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of science will find much to provoke and stimulate them in this book.


Similar Products

In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life SciencesThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary EditionThe Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe ItselfMaking Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science)