In this groundbreaking interpretation of America's founding and of its entire system of judicial review, Larry Kramer reveals that the colonists fought for and created a very different system--and held a very different under...

Buy Now From Amazon

In this groundbreaking interpretation of America's founding and of its entire system of judicial review, Larry Kramer reveals that the colonists fought for and created a very different system--and held a very different understanding of citizenship--than Americans believe to be the norm today. "Popular sovereignty" was not just some historical abstraction, and the notion of "the people" was more than a flip rhetorical device invoked on the campaign trail. Questions of constitutional meaning provoked vigorous public debate and the actions of government officials were greeted with celebratory feasts and bonfires, or riotous resistance. Americans treated the Constitution as part of the lived reality of their daily existence. Their self-sovereignty in law as much as politics was active not abstract.



Similar Products

Unruly Americans and the Origins of the ConstitutionConquest by Law: How the Discovery of America Dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of Their LandsDemocracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard Paperbacks)Documents of American Constitutional and Legal History: Volume 1: From the Founding to 1896 (Documents of American Constitutional & Legal History)The Slaveholding Republic: An Account of the United States Government's Relations to SlaveryTaking the Constitution Away from the CourtsThe Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the ConstitutionDred Scott v. Sandford: A Brief History with Documents (Bedford Series in History & Culture)